Posted on

A Review of Cryo Chambers From Poland: Juka vs. Cryo Arctic

Cryotherapy is gaining wide acceptance. In 2020, the entire industry was worth $ 3.8 billion, and it will grow at a compounded annual rate of 10.3% from now to 2028.1 If you’re looking for affordable cryotherapy machines from Poland, Juka and Cryo Arctic are great options. 

Here’s a quick comparison of their features. 

Juka vs. Cryo Arctic: How Do They Compare?

When choosing a cryotherapy machine, there are several factors you should consider. This includes profitability, safety features, financing, and warranty. The final decisions should, however, be dependent on your business goals and preferences. 

Juka and Cryo Arctic machines could help you achieve business success, and here’s a review of their features. 

Cooling Method

The Juka cryotherapy machine is nitrogen-cooled while Cryo Arctic is refrigeration cooled. Both cooling methods are effective, but the difference is in how cold air flows to the chamber. 

For the Juka, you fill the chamber with liquid nitrogen, which then cools the air inside. Since nitrogen is dangerous, the client’s head has to stay outside during sessions. Cryo Arctic allows whole body cryotherapy as the air in the chamber is electronically cooled. 

Safety Features

There have been several cryotherapy accidents and clients are now cautious about their safety. In one incident, a salon worker froze to death and wasn’t discovered until 10 hours later.2

Both cryotherapy machines are very safe and come with onboard O2 sensors. They monitor the oxygen levels inside the chambers to ensure that the lenient is safe. Juka also has an electronic lift system to adjust client’s positions based on their height. Its door shut-off feature ensures oxygen remains inside the cabin. 

The Cryo Arctic comes with a pulse oxygen reader. This device monitors the vitals of your clients during sessions. This enables you to stop a session in case of an emergency. It also has Wi-Fi, has a diagnostic display for the client, a smart tablet, and uses an electric lift system.

Exterior Footprint

Bothe cryotherapy machines are relatively the same size. The Juka is, however, slightly larger. It measures 61x50x96 inches, while Cryo Arctic is 63x39x88 inches. The exterior footprint of the Juka is 57″ x 36″ and the Cryo Arctic is 91″ X 71″.

Warranty and Financing

Both machines have a 2-year warranty, and financing options are available for Juka. 

Juka vs. Cryo Arctic: Which One Is Better? 

The Juka and Cryo Arctic are both great for small businesses. They are relatively affordable, come with a warranty, and have incredible safety features. Both machines also have an electric lift system, and their manufacturers are based in Poland.

They, however, have different cooling systems, so it all boils down to your preferences. 

Links to Sources Used

  1. Cryotherapy Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report – https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/cryotherapy-market 
  2. Salon worker praised cryotherapy — then ‘froze to death’ during treatment – https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/10/26/salon-worker-praised-cryotherapy-then-froze-to-death-during-treatment/
Posted on

Wifi Enabled Cryo Chambers: Cryosense vs. Cryopod

Technological advancements in the cryotherapy industry often take shape in the form of machines. There was a time when basic machines could cut it. Currently, you have to consider factors such as safety, design, efficiency, and technological features.

Perhaps the most exciting development in these machines is the Wifi features. Everything is going wireless; why not the cryotherapy industry? 

Here’s a  review of the Cryosense and Crypod cryotherapy machines. 

A Comparison of 2 Wifi Enabled Cryo Chambers: Cryosense vs. Cryopod

In addition to being wifi enabled, the main similarity between Crysensse and Cryopod is that they don’t require a dry-out time. These 2 machines are, however, different, as is shown by the comparison below. 

Cooling Method & Manufacturer

The Cryosense machine is manufactured in Spain and uses nitrogen cooling. Crypod, on the other hand, is from the UK and is refrigeration cooled. Nitrogen cooling uses liquid nitrogen to lower the temperatures of the cryo-chamber. This means that your clients have to keep their heads above the treatment area because nitrogen is hazardous and could cause asphyxia.1

Refrigeration cooling uses an electric current to keep the temperatures low. It’s safer and allows you to offer whole-body cryotherapy to your clients. 

Warranty & Financing

Both cryotherapy machines come with a 2 year warranty period and have available financing options.

If you’re just starting out, you may not have the financial ability to buy a machine. Financing options allow you to start without breaking the bank. It also allows you to grow your business worry-free, especially if the payment terms are favorable. 

Safety features

Cryotherapy accidents aren’t uncommon, which is why you need to consider safety features.

One particularly disturbing incident is of a salon worker who froze to death in a cryotherapy machine. The saddest part is that her body remained undiscovered for 10 hours.Clients are also skeptical about their well-being, and you need to convince them that they’ll be okay. 

Cryosense comes with an onboard O2 sensor that monitors the clients’ oxygen levels. The Crypod, however, has more features, including a thermal image camera and a pulse oxygen reader.

Levels of Efficiency

The Cryosense uses around 5-6 liters per session, while the Cryopod uses 4-7 liters. Cryosense is, however, more innovative as it delivers both heat and cryotherapy in one chamber. Customers can either choose to alternate between cold temperatures and heat. This makes sessions more engaging.    

Cryosense vs. Cryopod: Which One Is Better?

Both machines have distinct features, and the choice boils down to your business needs. They have a 2 year warranty period and have safety features that your customers would appreciate. 

Links to sources used

  1. Whole-Body Cryotherapy in Athletes: From Therapy to Stimulation. An Updated Review of the Literature – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5411446/ 
  2. Salon worker praised cryotherapy — then ‘froze to death’ during treatment – https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/10/26/salon-worker-praised-cryotherapy-then-froze-to-death-during-treatment/